I remember someone suggesting a vouch system but that could easily be loopholed.

@has_z ye i mean just some sort of it would be pretty good idk completly how but i think it would save the fun of the server

I think high risk was a great system even though it made recruiting alittle hard with it toned down I can see this as a great addition to protect the community <3

Respectfully i agree with this (i feel like high risk was good when it was implemented) but i feel like the timing of this suggestion is a bit weird considering pvpers from other servers have been constantly recruited (at least for as long as I've joined the player) and I haven't seen as much of this concern when it happened and there were builder/smaller nations constantly being attacked by other server clans.

I remember plenty of people complaining about how recruiting was too easy for one side and too hard for the other and that's what led to high risk being removed. Now the same people (not saying this necessarily applies in your case) are complaining and saying it was a good thing

Totally understand the timing thing maru but this came about due to some rumors weve been hearing of a especially toxic pvp clan being recruited and our concern over the hurt that could cause members of the community.

Toxic people from pvp clans have been constantly recruited for as long as I remember playing on the server, and I believe that if they bring this kind of behaviour and toxicity to the community they should be reported and banned.

I agree. The PvP situation is insane. Assault regions are just pointless if it's an extension of war on another server. I very much disliked it when certain players brought movecrafters from other servers just for naval regions. I assume it's frustrating for PvPers also.

maybe not high risk but like a vouch system would work where if they get high risk blocked then you can vouch for them to be unbanned and like agree they wont be racist and arent an alt and if they are racist/an alt then you get banned aswell

This has already been suggested by Davidplayer456 months ago when high risk was still a thing. I believe the suggestion was rejected.

the high risk system was very messy and was keeping even the nicest people banned (also a ton of really toxic ones) i think instead of that the requirements to attend sieges/pvp regions should be increased to where it requires active playtime outside of siege zones to attend to give real players a fair fighting chance in sieges over whoever brings the most pvpers from other servers

You want high risk back when we are recruiting, this is pure copium and if staff take half a second to check it out theyll see that too

You shouldnt be recruiting racists anyways? Hiring people you know are toxic and or racist etc is actively hurting the community, (pretty sure some of our log ons shouldnt be allowed)