Hi, would this be people online on the server overall or people online from participant nations?

i did not think about online people from participant nations i think that either one of those would work but that the total players would be a better way that way nations cant try to force everyone to log off

This system would be incredibly easy to abuse

it wouldnt be easy to abuse as it would require no one to be on to have lower max cappers which doesnt happen (you can tell your nation to log off but thats not actually viable if they arent at the siege itself) or the other way around where i suppose you try logging onto alts but that already requires rules breaking to begin with

first of all , the suggestion really doesn’t make any sesnse , why would an outcome/progression of a siege be based upon people who may not even be at the siege.

As snasy said , its so easy to abuse this, one side just calls all and every person for one singular session and not have to actually contest “main” sessions as they would be higher up on points.

If this is the case , the only other viable option for the attackers that they should be allowed to drill the fort at any given time , which is crazy in its own world. Having sieges vary in cap will cause both sides to be tired of it and start complaining lmao.

Goofy ah suggestion

Terrible idea. Now instead of the pings for log off at siege theres gonna be pings for log off everywhere. I don't want to have to stay off the server all week end because of this.

This will just encourage even more people to log off