Wouldn't Australia be just a way for OE/GRE to get free money since there's literally only 1 nation in Australia

I have no clue @Meowsalod :D but yeah its great you said that actually because I have the perfect response :D

Having a Siege region in Australia would be a way for OE/GRE/AE/RE or whom ever however it would also bring in traffic of the other Nations.

Wouldn't Sahara Region be free money for SS/Rome/UK/Shin/MEU? However, all the nations have created their towns near the region for their tanks which brings conflict to that area. Im wanting to bring Conflict to Australia and all those other regions. I want to bring the Population outwards away from Europe to the rest of the world to try to increase the population.

tibet siege region, antartar siege region

AEZ zones over middle east only fighter pvp

I agree with ruleblocks that there should be fighter only PvP. These would be easier to find a place for, as you do not need favorable terrain, like big oceans or flat terrain. You could essentially put these zones anywhere, and even change location on a week by week basis if you want.

Isn’t this just benefiting Japan Russia and oceanic since khazikstan mongolia and Australia on those 3 can reach. There is no space to make a fort and nation for any other nation to contest the Australia region. Whereas in Africa and the Americas there is. And same with Kazakhstan

would be cool to have an artctic siege region in greenland or north canada

If new regions were to be added they should be one in asia and one in America

Who is going to contest these regions ? It’s just free regions for nations on the server. Alliance can’t fight and prepare 20 different regions since half of us have life’s.

I think if we can make a case for smaller nations this is a good idea.
Id argue a tank region between Oxination and American Empire (hurdsells nation).
Im kind of bored seeing just Sahara v Russia.

I also want to promote a North Sea region, I hope Rome/UK/NC can contest.
The North Sea region could perhaps control the Denmark Straight?

"I think if we can make a case for smaller nations this is a good idea.
Id argue a tank region between Oxination and American Empire (hurdsells nation).
Im kind of bored seeing just Sahara v Russia."

It will be another Russia vs Sahara region... Get over it the same people will contest it anywhere

To reply to some overall i agree with a lot of you all, I want to get MORE nations involved I'm not trying to promote Russia and Sahara fights I want to see more out there...

Im not wanting free Siege Regions for money I want to create conflict in areas where Alliance or Coalition or anyone else I'm missing to also go over an fight in. I am aware Alliance is somewhat "Boycotting" certain regions because you don't want to fight there so Zaify will have to remove it. I want to create more population around the map not just in Europe. (I know its a strong accusation but you kinda make it obvious)

As for responding to Pji they were only suggestions, however Mongolia yes is legit on Russia and Japans door step, so come and take it? Sahara is on Sahara's door step and Russia comes over all the time. Same goes with the Atlantic, Russia comes over or Med Russia still comes over. Its a two way street Pji, I want to break the whole "everyone is in Europe" and bring population around the other continents. however overall I'm wanting more Land Regions since there is only 1.