I disagree with mid atlantic part since its actually contestable

I agree with this but this region should be located around Moscow or central Russia or like Afghanistan Pakistan part. Removing mid Atlantic and Atlantic (yes I don't want Indian to be removed since it can be contested quite easily and was proved when pji sieged it for the funnywhen like 10 people were online from thier side) would be good as well.

i also agree with lordsrubka but yes it would be quite fun to have a EU timezone region in the stan countries (kazakhstan, turkmenistan, uzbekistan and more)

also i forgot to mention but it could be a ground attack region like there would be CAS but it would be limited by the range ofc. also it could have a unique thing that normal tanks get more points than heavytanks so that normal tanks could be used more.

Lighteye just because it can be contested timezone wise doesnt mean that it will be. And atlantic shouldnt be deleted because coalition has pacific as their money farm but alliance doesnt. It would be only fair to delete one farm region from both sides to add a new region(preferably in east africa so that sahara could realistically contest it since coalition has ALOT more asians and east europeans)

I wouldnt say delete because of nations owning them.

Delete because they are never contested, they dont add anything to the gameplay and are just used to inflate the economy

I think there shouldnt be 1 regions (pacific and atlantic) right together but i think the pacific could go down a bit and seperate indian ocean more mainland india but make it further. My opinion and dont complain about it please.

There is also med(the most contested naval region) and i dont see a point of having 2 extra regions when they are never contested and are just used to farm money. They add nothing gameplay wise and thus should be deleted

Tbh true, the atlantic or pacific can stay but i think removing atlantic or pacific is a good thing. They could be resetted maby every 1-2 weeks to have no ruler