I agree with awarding more kill points to the losing side based on the point lead of the winning side.

I was wondering whether this should really replace the current counter-attack bonus, rather than exist alongside it. Clearing the banner of many cappers is no easy task. However, the current bonus favours the winning side: they are more likely to outmatch the losing side quantitatively and qualitatively and, generally speaking, will find it easier to kill cappers. It is quite clear it is not the catch-up mechanic that Goosius intended it to be, but rather the opposite.

The current bonus favors too much groups of people that get the first lead in points since its easier for them to prevent opponents from catching up to it via kills when they start capping back

This suggestion is related to kill points specifically, and the other one is related to objective points. But regardless both are made to bring the attention to how many points are gained in less contested sessions compared to the contested ones and hopefully make it so contested ones are valued way more since that actually should be the indicator on who is "stronger side" and not just staying awake for 20+ hours daily on a block day siege that legit happens on workdays

block game siege*