Wasn't the purpose of the PvP regions to be non-movecraft? This suggestion doesn't make sense. What will you do against the IFV? Only way to counter it would be tanks which would just make these regions a copy paste of the Sahara region. Also the arena in the PvP regions aren't build for movecraft lmao. Goodluck getting ur ifv through the door at Scandinavia

This is ragebait,
sorry ill break it down incase you don't understand/english isn't your first language:
- It is a double standard to allow PVP at naval regions but not movecraft at PVP regions.
- There should be no PVP in movecraft region.s

Its highlighting the absurdity of allowing PVP at these regions and providing a solution.

Illyt, this suggestion is attempted blackmail and isn't a suggestion.

"do this or ill RUIN your pvp regions" - illyt 2024

PVP regions weren't built for IFVs (or tanks) and forcing users to bring tanks to a pvp region is less then stellar.
Those who attended the sahara region never complained about being killed mid-battle.

Navel ship designers have iron doors, iron trapdoors and blocks to seal themselves off from player intervention.
This has occurred since the start of N2 (yes, i have done this myself) and nobody has taken a real issue to it

Well if thats what u mean u shouldn't be making the title about something which isn't actually something u want to have implemented into the game. If you dont want to be killed whilst piloting a ship just build ur ship right so theres no way climbing ontop of where u standing at and if u get sunk there shouldn't be a reason for you to be protected because then ur just a player in wilderness which should be able to get killed since ur not in claims.

Dear Rick, you are completely misled.
Given decoration blocks are destroyed after a couple of minutes, entering a Pilot box is incredibly easy. If you build a large bridge, it his a massive target and will easily 3-4 people running round inside your bridge, camping you (as occurred during the GNE Days).

If you build a tinted glass box, you are completely vulnerable, because a single 4 inch shell, you are open to all means of ranged combat and idiots with horses or worst case someone with jumpboost.

There is NO WAY to design a ship that has a pilot box that's secure without requiring the pilots to use freecam.

EVERYBODY has taken real issue of it, staff never listen when its brought up. I have made point in 2022, 2023 and 2024 now.

Naval regions arent tank regions, tanks have periscopes, its a lot harder to kill a tank pilot who is over 80%. Tho it is incredibly easy to kill a pilot of a ship at 90%.

I am simply pointing the out the double standard here. If PVPers don't want movecrafters in their regions so they are enjoyable, why should movecrafters have to put up with PVPers. This isn't even a side v side comparison as leadership from both sides despises PVPers at NAVAL regions.

ive also in DEPTH argued for periscopes on ships only to be ignored every time. The idea that suddenly bridge designs would disappear or look ugly is frankly not true. Periscopes would need armoured bridges or if they are invunrable still have the same adequiete bridges as they have today -minus the ugly as hell tinted glass box.

Its incredibly hard to shoot a tinted glass box high above the bridge on the ship and even if you manage to hit it, its hard to kill the pilot since the ships are moving. Also killing pilots whilst theyre piloting won't benefit you because the ship gets auto-released once you die and you won't get points. In the end its wilderness where you're fighting and you're not protected by any claims so you should be able to get killed.

It really is not difficult
also yes it is beneficial esp early on

Fqrtex is so insanely right! Never agreed with him more, and Illyt why would movecraft be a thing in a PVP (PLAYER VS PLAYER ON LAND NOT IN A VEHICLE) as fqrtex said it’s legit meant not to be movecraft! If you can’t pvp learn or don’t come to them!!!