Hi, so I actually do agree that regions should be more contested, but I do not think changing the time of them is a good way to do so right now. Currently while each major side is majority EU or NA players (Coalition has more EU players then Alliance) I think regions are spread pretty Fairly. South Atlantic and Sahara are 2/6 total movecraft regions which are currently at 16:30. While they are more contested then North and Med, they are not contested that much still.

Indian and Pacific are good times for EU players, but for NA players they are kind of early, so the argument of 20:30 being too late for EU players, could also be used as 14:30 being too early for NA players.

That is why I think the region time should not be changed, but I do think there should be payoff adjustments to make the regions Pacific and Indian more valued since they are most contested.

I think moving the region back a hour or a hour and a half would make a big difference already.

If we move that region back it'll overlap with Sahara. The timing for regions as is is fine, we have regions that are early morning NA/early afternoon EU, regions that are noon NA and afternoon/early evening EU, and regions that are afternoon NA and early nighttime EU.

If regions are more contested the payout for both winners and losers should be adjusted as such, but changing the times of a region to a time when a lot of NA people aren't available/awake yet on weekends when there is already a region at that time and a region even earlier than that is non-sensical to me.

yeah but i think it should be moved 2 hours earlier at max

20:30 is the best balance for Europeans and Americans. It puts the North Atlantic window at only 21:30-22:30 for the majority for Europeans and 16:30 for east coast Americans. Moving it 4 hours earlier would not only disadvantage Western Europeans, many of whom are busy that early on a Saturday, but also Americans that would be out that early on a Saturday, not to mention how early it would be for Americans on the west coast. If you want to move it 4 hours earlier to advantage yourself to disadvantage all Western Europeans and Americans why not move it 4 hours later to make it a much more convenient time for Americans? 24:30 sounds great! Not to mention it’s at the same time as Sahara so if anything this would only lead to less movecraft fights overall.

16:30 UTC isn’t optimal for everyone. I’m NA, and while that time works for some people, it really doesn’t for me and many others I know. The pacific region is also too early for myself. Just because it’s convenient for you doesn’t mean it’s the best for everyone. Plus, Atlantic has been at this time for ages, it’s better to adapt to the current time than to change it just for comfort.

The Region we are talking about is North Atlantic.

The region that got sieged 4 or 5 times in almost 2 years now, and we all know the reason behind it right?

Lets say north has not been won since 1.5 years now because it was uncontested 1.5 years is 545 days x 3456 its 1.8M literaly same with mediterranean its the same thing?
If the regions don't get contested what is the point of keeping them as regions?

Why not Instead to add a new tank region or maybe a only wooden ships region or maybe only Air region instead of this 2 regions that have not been sieged in years yet they continue giving money for free.

In my opinion this is not how it should work if the region is not contested for thing long time yall should realise that there is something wrong that this region is not getting sieged maybe we should change something about it.

I say if its too much to move it from 20:30 to 16:30 at least they should move it 1-2 hours earlier or else it will continue not getting sieged and just be another region that the last time it was for real fought on it was when coal torps were a thing.

North Atlantic not getting sieged is the fault of the Coalition and the Coalition solely. You guys have proven you can take a region that involves large numbers of dreadnoughts and cruisers with Pacific and Indian but complain about North Atlantic because you don't want to put in the work to fight the Alliance fleet full force.

This suggestion solely benefits the Coalition as it puts the timezones square in your peak hours and it's astonishingly poorly veiled as "balanced."

How about training instead of complaining before making suggestions hm?

^ This sounds almost exactly like what we said about Pacific.

Plant can you link what suggestion you're talking about?

China falls

https://www.ccnetmc.com/suggestions/view/3293-nerf-pacific-payouts-/



Once china took the region

https://www.ccnetmc.com/suggestions/view/3187-increase-payout-for-pacific/



This one was frankly stupid remove every region we held. Though it probly has the most discussion in it and does mention the only reason it wasn't sieged cause you did have ports.

https://www.ccnetmc.com/suggestions/view/2526-removal-of-the-pacific-and-indian-region-and-sahara-region-and-america-region/


Can't find the older ones asking for the pacific nerf and i searched all 229 pages.

Ashes are we serious right now? LOL

The suggestion i made is about reducing the time of north atlantic so it can start getting sieged and actually attended. What your talking about makes no sense how will making the region start 1 hour or maybe 2 hours earlier affect your fleet what? will your ships dissapear out of the blue or? i dont get where do you get all that.

What i was saying is that if the region starts just a little earlier Coalition will start attending it with actual pilots. I dont know how is it more fun to just stack the ports with ships that will never be used and you will never be able to have fun with them.

i agree with wrecker, only reason why i cant participate NA is timezone