lore accurate

naturally

This is the most cope-response suggestion I've ever seen. This suggestion has already been made last time regions were fought and rejected.

ashes please explain (without being toxic) whats wrong with this - why do you think a NON interventionist nation should be intervening?

also please link to the other suggestion because i dont recall non interventionist being used to this extent before ever

I think youve got a point here Panda, but I wish the rest of your friends could be more honest like you are.

1/10 ragebait panda lol

This suggestion is pure cope because regions have always been a bit of an independent thing from sieges, so cutting off 50% of the server from it because you want to siege them harder is not fair at all, especially seeing as movecraft is one of the main attractions of the server so this suggestion is just going to make people quit. Another issue is that being non-interventionist is only a mild nuisance for attacking nations because there's a cap on how much DP you can spend when attacking someone.

You guys have always made suggestions to try and make sieging regions harder for your enemies and suddenly stopped doing so when you guys actually started training and winning, and are doing it again now that you lost a few.

https://www.ccnetmc.com/suggestions/view/3939-region-changes-/ The comments NotPotz and I both made under this suggestion also apply here.

because lowkenuinely it's non interventionist intervening

Ashes you're yapping but not one point of why non interventionalist are intervene in attacking

"mild nuisance" while eats all your dp

says the siege logon

I made my points quite clearly, it's your problem if you deliberately ignore them because they don't fit your view.

As for "eats up all your DP," last week the majority of the Alliance was occupied, so I don't see how it was all that big of a problem for the Coalition.